@Article{TomásFonAlmLeoPer:2016:UrPoEs,
author = "Tom{\'a}s, Livia and Fonseca, Leila Maria Garcia and Almeida,
Cl{\'a}udia Maria de and Leonardi, Fernando and Pereira,
Madalena",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and Geopixel Geotechnologies
Consulting and Service Ltd, S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos, Brazil
and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Urban population estimation based on residential buildings volume
using IKONOS-2 images and lidar data",
journal = "International Journal of Remote Sensing",
year = "2016",
volume = "37",
number = "S1",
pages = "1--28",
keywords = "Buildings, Housing, Optical radar, Tall buildings, Accuracy
assessment, Digital surface models, Federal governments, High rise
residential building, Hypothesis tests, Methodological approach,
Residential building, Urban population, Population statistics,
accuracy assessment, elevation, IKONOS, lidar, model validation,
population estimation, residential location, satellite data,
satellite imagery, urban population.",
abstract = "This paper presents a methodological approach to estimation of
urban population using the volume of single houses and high-rise
residential buildings obtained from an IKONOS-2 ortho-image and
light detection and raging (lidar) data. The estimates are
directly executed at the finest scale level (i.e. the housing
unit) and are then aggregated at the census district level for
further validation with the aid of official data supplied by the
local and federal governments. Unlike prior works, this study
executes a thorough assessment of horizontal and elevation
accuracy for the IKONOS-2 and lidar data used in the experiment.
The methodological stages are threefold: the construction of a 3D
city model, the accuracy assessment of the ortho-image and digital
surface models (DSMs), and the quantification of urban population.
The validation was accomplished by means of linear regression and
associated hypothesis tests, considering the estimated population
and the reference data. The results showed that there was a
systematic underestimation of population. On average, the
conducted estimates assessed 31 fewer inhabitants per district and
lie 1.35% below the expected values given by the reference data.
In spite of the observed underestimation, the estimated population
can be regarded as equivalent to the population provided by the
reference data at a 1% level of significance.",
doi = "10.1080/01431161.2015.1121301",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1121301",
issn = "0143-1161",
language = "en",
targetfile = "tomas_urban.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}